Construction employment declined in more than nine out of 10 metro areas from March to April, a time when industry employment typically increases in most locations, an analysis by the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of America of new government data shows.
North Carolina communities experienced different levels of job loss ranging from 4 to 5 percent to 10 to 11 percent. The Charlotte metropolitan area lost 3,400 jobs or 5 percent, while Raleigh’s loss was 6 percent, of 2,400 jobs.
Here are is the data for individual regions, with the number of employees in March, April, the percentage change and the number of employees added (or lost), and the national ranking.
- North Carolina Statewide Construction 22,970 23,130 1% 160
- Statewide Mining, Logging, and Construction 23,530 23,700 1% 170
- Asheville Mining, Logging, and Construction 10,100 9,600 -5% -500 98
- Burlington Mining, Logging, and Construction 3,300 3,000 -9% -300 181
- Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Mining, Logging, and Construction 70,300 66,900 -5% -3,400 98
- Durham-Chapel Hill Mining, Logging, and Construction 9,500 9,000 -5% -500 98
- Fayetteville Mining, Logging, and Construction 5,800 5,400 -7% -400 144
- Greensboro-High Point Mining, Logging, and Construction 15,700 14,800 -6% -900 121
- Greenville, NC Mining, Logging, and Construction 3,900 3,600 -8% -300 161
- Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton Mining, Logging, and Construction 4,500 4,200 -7% -300 144
- Raleigh Mining, Logging, and Construction 41,700 39,300 -6% -2,400 121
- Rocky Mount Mining, Logging, and Construction 2,800 2,500 -11% -300 216
- Wilmington Mining, Logging, and Construction 9,300 8,600 -8% -700 161
- Winston-Salem Mining, Logging, and Construction 11,700 10,400 -11% -1,300 216
- Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC Mining, Logging, and Construction 11,100 10,300 -7% -800 144
- Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC Mining, Logging, and Construction 38,600 37,100 -4% -1,500 75
New federal transportation funding could help restore many lost construction jobs, but cautioned that new legislation released recently by House Democrats includes new regulatory measures that could undermine the broader goals of the measure.
“Today’s employment report shows how few areas were left unscathed by April’s unprecedented job losses,” said Ken Simonson, the association’s chief economist. “Sadly, our latest survey shows project cancellations are escalating, making further job losses inevitable unless there is funding for widespread new projects.”
The economist said construction employment declined between March and April in 326, or 91 percent, out of 358 metro areas and increased in only 20 areas (6 percent). Industry employment was unchanged in 14 areas. Over the previous 30 years, 75 percent of metro areas added construction jobs from March to April, on average, while 12 percent of metros shed jobs.
New York City lost the largest number of construction jobs for the month: 75,900 jobs or 49 percent of the March total. There were also extremely large construction job losses in the Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, Wash. area, 44,200 jobs or 41 percent. Construction employment fell by half or more in three areas: Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, Pa. (-54 percent, -27,200 jobs); Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, Mich. (-52 percent, -26,100 jobs); and Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, Mass. (-50 percent, -2,300 jobs).
Simonson noted that more respondents in the association’s latest survey reported an upcoming project had been canceled in May or June than in April, implying that further job losses are likely. One-fifth of respondents reported a project scheduled to begin in May had been canceled, as did nearly one-quarter (24 percent) of respondents regarding a project scheduled to start in June or later, compared to 16 percent in April.
Association officials said new federal infrastructure investments in roads, bridges, transit and rail systems, like those proposed in a new transportation bill released today by House Democrats, would provide a needed boost to construction employment in many parts of the country and support a broader economic recovery. But they cautioned that new programmatic and regulatory requirements in the measure could undermine some the bill’s potential economic benefits. They urged Congressional leaders to work in a broad, bipartisan manner to rapidly pass a measure that expands highway capacity, improves bridges, builds transit and rail systems and supports long-term economic growth before current legislation expires.
“It is encouraging to see House Democrats proposing a significant increase in investments for transportation infrastructure,” said Stephen E. Sandherr, the association’s chief executive officer. “With over 40 million people unemployed and construction jobs declining in most metro areas, Congress needs to ensure that new, sustainable, investments bring as many people back to work as possible to help improve our aging highway, transit and rail systems.”